Which revision corrects the faulty coordination in the sentence? allied bombing raids destroyed many german jets, and the jets were still on the ground.
a. allied bombing raids destroyed many german jets while the jets were still on the ground.
b. allied bombing raids destroyed many german jets, yet the jets were still on the ground.
c. the jets still on the ground, allied bombing raids destroyed many german jets.
d. the german jets still on the ground during allied bombing raids were destroyed by them.

A). Allied bombing raids destroyed many German jets while the jets were still on the ground.

Explanation:

As per the question, the revision that corrects the malfunctioning in the sentence is displayed in option A as it best compliments and comprehends the meaning of the sentence. The other options are either manipulating the meaning of the sentence by adjusting the clauses or reflecting a grammatical error that ruins the actual meaning of the statement. Option B falsely employs 'yet' and 'still' in a single clause while option C incorrectly substitutes the phrases without using any conjunction and option D inappropriately uses the preposition 'during' as a conjunction. Thus, only option A offers an effective and meaningful sentence without any errors.

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.