What are two differences in how time line and speech provide information about Malala Yousafzai?

Usually, timelines are made from an objective point of view for a person, although the timeline can tell the readers the achievement of a certain person, the decision of what kind of person s/he is up to the watcher's judgment. However, speech about Malala Yousafzai is from a person who has a real life experience connection with that person. So, speeches directly show us what kind of person Malala was to them. and I think those are the differences.

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.