[W]e might have been a free & a great people together, but a communication of grandeur & of freedom it seems is
below their dignity, be it so, since they will have it: the road
to happiness and to glory is open to us too; we will climb it
apart from them, and acquiesce in the necessity which
denounces our eternal separation!
Why might the Continental Congress have revised this passage from the draft
of the declaration?
O A. This passage appeals too much to pathos.
O B. The passage appeals too much to ethos.
O C. The passage appeals too much to logos.
O D. The passage appeals too much to kairos.

you can earn the crowns by answering others questions an being selected brainliest if your answer is the best.

good luck: )

its c

explanation:

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

write it down

then read over it

then trun it in