Someone who is applying for a loan from a bank can expect the bank to: OA. investigate the person's parents to see if they were financially
OB. request proof that the person has graduated from a good college.
OC. check the rson's credit history to make sure he or she pays
responsible.
debts on time.
O D. demand that the person close all of his or her accounts at
competing banks.

the answer is c

Explanation:

The bank needs to know if the person is reliable and trustable with the banks money so that they know they will get the money back. If you could give me brainliest answer that would be great!

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

"facing the rising sun of our new day begun

let us march on till victory is won.",

because the rising sun is a symbol of hope.