Which options accurately describe how the US Supreme Court’s conclusion regarding Ingraham v. Wright compared with the decisions of the lower courts? Select all that apply.

US Supreme Court: Ingraham v. Wright

It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.

It overruled the District Court’s decision, which found that corporal punishment can be defined as cruel and unusual punishment.

It overruled the Court of Appeals’ decision, which found that the students were indeed subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.

It supported the Court of Appeals’ decision that the students had been denied due process.

It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.

Explanation:

The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.

The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.

The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.

they are all talking about chocolate (next time you post a question with "which" post the choices too)

at nineteen years old, nicole c. kear's biggest concern is choosing a major--until she walks into a doctor's office in midtown manhattan and gets a life-changing diagnosis. she is going blind, courtesy of an eye disease called retinitis pigmentosa, and has only a decade or so before lights out. instead of making preparations as the doctor suggests, kear decides to carpe diem and make the most of the vision she has left. she joins circus school, tears through boyfriends, travels the world, and through all these hi-jinks, she keeps her vision loss a secret.

when kear becomes a mother, just a few years shy of her vision's expiration date, she amends her carpe diem strategy, giving up recklessness in order to relish every moment with her kids. her secret, though, is harder to surrender - and as her vision deteriorates, harder to keep hidden. as her world grows blurred, one thing becomes clear: no matter how hard she fights, she won't win the battle against blindness. but if she comes clean with her secret, and comes to terms with the loss, she can still win her happy ending

googles summry you can summarize this in your own words