As with many other literary and artistic movements, the ideology and the style of the American romantic period was a reaction to the previous age. Romantic writers reacted to the formality of the writing that was favored during the age of reason. Romanticism embraced an organic spirituality and a subjective outlook. If a new movement is in sharp opposition to the preceding movement, does it make the style and ideology of the earlier movement less relevant or less valuable? Can there be any real standard for judging literary value if the standards of judgment keep changing?
Support your answer with arguments and examples.

Which sentence is an effective example of i-language for the following scenario? aaron's coworker bryce has not been working on the team project their boss assigned them. answer choices: "i need you to do some work on this project." "i feel like this assignment isn't a priority to you." "i wish you wouldn't be so casual about this." "i think you're incompetent."

In describing jimmy wells as the truest, most loyal fellow, what tone is conveyed

Iwill give brainliest banquo. how goes the night, boy? fleance. the moon is down, i have not heard the clock. banquo. and she goes down at twelve. fleance: i take't, 'tis later, sir. banquo: hold, take my sword. there's husbandry in heaven, their candles are all out. take thee that too. a heavy summons lies like lead upon me, and yet i would not sleep: merciful powers, restrain in me the cursed thoughts that nature gives way to in repose! using context clues, what is the meaning of the word "candles" and what effect does that have on the play? the night is cloudy, so no one can really see what is happening. there are no stars, which could be considered candles in heaven, so heaven cannot see the sin happening on the earth below the moon is not illuminating the heavens, so everyone up there is asleep. the candles from the surrounding countryside are all out, so macbeth can carry out the murder