This is a claim: To create a more engaging learning environment, teachers should use a system that randomly determines which students to call on in class. what is the evidence for this:
answer
1) A study outlined in the Journal of Management Education found that, in classes where teachers randomly call upon students to answer questions, students are more likely to volunteer to speak up in class.
2) Many of my friends say that they often have interesting ideas in class discussions, but they're too shy to share their thoughts with their classmates and teachers.
3) According to one Edutopia article, teachers can improve the quality of classroom discussion by giving students time to think before answering a question.

I'm pretty sure it's the 1st one.

Most definitely not the third one, and unlikely to be the 2nd one. So go for the 1st one.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

life 2200 right now look pretty good because on how quickly humans are advansing, life will be a breeze. most by by then would have out lawed disese.most wouldn't have to work anymore beacuse everything would be free. the econamy for most countires would be really good, also by then u.s.a would have probably would have expaned its borders.

so that counculeds my thoghts of how 2200 is you for reading