Istvan is running for a seat on the city council. During a debate, he points out that his opponent, the incumbent, recently voted to raise taxes, proclaiming, "He's raised your taxes
before. He's going to raise them again, and he's going to keep raising them until none of you
can afford to live here anymore!" Which logical fallacy did Istvan use in the debate?
O falling victim to false cause
appealing to false authority
O begging
slippery slope

my guy how are we supposed to know

the excerpt from chapter 2 of "animal farm", by george orwell that is an example of foreshadowing is "these three (snowball, napoleon, and squealer) had elaborated old major's teachings into a complete system of thought to which they gave the name of animalism." animal farm is an allegory of how czarist russia developed into communist russia with all its corruption. old major's teachings represent marx's theories turned into communism, animalism, by the three pigs. this foreshadows the oppression and corruption that will follow this revolt.

to and without are prepositions, so a, b, and d are prepositional phrases. the adverb phrase is c, about the surprise.

explanation:

i think the answer is either c or d

im thinking d might make more sense though

sorry if im wrong