PlzZZzZzzZzzzZZzzZ Help If you dont know then dont answer
and stop stealing the points

What argument and claims does Henry present in “Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death!”? Are his claims valid and supported with relevant and sufficient evidence? Does he use effective reasoning to support his argument? Does he use false statements or fallacious reasoning? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your response should be at two or three complete paragraphs.

Jeez, talk about trying to get the extra word count in.

Henry's claims are valid, and there is evidence in the paper to prove it. His reasoning is a little repetitive, using his loyalty to god as a reason over and over again.

I can't write two or three paragraphs about this, but if you look at it in a way that people from this timeline would look at it, you can probably yank enough text evidence to pull it together.

taking into account that a theme is the central topic a text treats and can be developed through a story, play, poem etc. the following are themes that can be further developed:  

my best friend jeffrey has many unusual interests. (the story could be about each of the unususal interests)

once a man gives his soul over to evil, he can never go back. (this could be a saying or a proverb)

the three sheepdogs lay around the yard all day. (it could be developed detailing how each of these sheepdogs lay around)

a priest's collar has an unusual effect upon people. (it could be developed detailing the different effect upon people)

innocence is a powerful force in a world full of corruption. (it could be developed detailing how is a world full of corruption)

king lear is a play shakespeare wrote later. (it is just a sentence and doesnt give any idea or topic to be discussed in details.

evil often wears the disguise of innocence. (this could be a saying or a proverb)

dramatic irony occurs when the reader/audience knows more about a character's situation than the character does. the one main effect is that it gives the reader a sense of superiority, or detached superiority. the reader not only seemingly discovers what is revealed, but feels superior for doing so.