Read the first two paragraphs of an essay about endangered animals. What is the relationship between the two paragraphs? According to the Center for Biological Diversity, 30 to 50 percent of all endangered animals may be extinct within the next 30 years. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 works to protect endangered species by making it illegal to capture, harm, or shoot any animal that is endangered. Unfortunately, human activity continues to be one of the leading causes of extinction.

Tigers are on the endangered species list. There were roughly 100,000 tigers around the world in the early 1900s. Now there are fewer than 4,000. With tiger poachers, undocumented tigers in captivity, and tiger products on sale in the black market, the tiger population will continue to decline.

A.
The second paragraph offers a solution for the problem in the first paragraph.
B.
The first and second paragraphs show events happening in sequential order.
C.
The first paragraph describes the cause, and the second paragraph explores the effect.
D.
The first paragraph provides background information for the second paragraph.

answer:

explanation:

c

the answer is subjective. i personally agree with the first answer for this question.

if one isn't strictly talking about objects then the correct answer would be 'my eyes' since according to this riddle i am asleep and in order to answer/open the door i need to open my eyes first of all.

however, if one is specifically looking for an object, then the first thing i would open would be the door

hope this !

the answer to the given question above would the one that wiesel is establishing and how is ethos by appeal to his authority in having survived the holocaust. hope this answers your question.

have a great day ahead!

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.