Which statement best identifies a detail that should be included in a summary and the reason it should be included? A The detail about the raccoon’s wanting to catch the crawfish should be included, because it is related to an important event in the story.

B The detail about the crawfish’s pinching the raccoon should be included, because it shows how mean and dangerous crawfish are.

C The detail about the warriors’ painting their faces should be included, because it explains how some of the characters look.

D The detail about the crawfish's thinking the raccoon is surely dead should be included, because it gives an accurate picture of the text.

it will show up when more than one person gives an answer

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

i believe it may be the hope this sorry if i'm wrong.