English
English, 03.12.2020 02:30, destinyterrea

Challenge yall do this Part II:
Write a logical, cohesive, multi-paragraph argument that addresses the following question:
Is Artificial Intelligence Taking Over Our Lives?

Checklist: In your essay, be sure to demonstrate the following skills:

Clearly state a claim on the issue. The claim may be in full agreement with claims provided in the article(s), in partial agreement, or completely different.
Develop and support with reasoning and evidence from the articles as well as past readings and observations.
Cite evidence from the articles correctly.
Show understanding of another logical perspective.
Refute counterarguments.
Organize ideas clearly and logically.
Communicate ideas effectively in standard written English.

and

Part I: Carefully read the following sources and find evidence that supports and refutes your claim.

Document A:

If A. I. Replaces Humans, Will Siri Lead Us Into the Sea?
Susan Bennett is a voice actress and in 2011 became the original voice of Apple iPhone’s Siri. UPDATED DECEMBER 5, 2016, 3:21 AM

It seems we no longer have to use our brains as much as we once did. Any one of our digital devices can instantly give us information that, in the past, would have required that we do research, read books, use the computers in our own heads. So, does a brain atrophy in the same way as a muscle if it isn’t used? As machines get smarter, is the opposite happening to us?

Unless machines are programmed with human emotions, we’ll have new intelligent creatures that won’t hate each other because of race, creed or religion — something that humans have seemed incapable of doing in the 6,000 years civilized man has been on the planet. But will they be able to create art, music, literature, comedy?

We’re about to find out in the next few years. Perhaps A. I. will replace humans, and Siri will lead us quietly into the sea. Fortunately for me, since Apple changed the original Siri voices worldwide beginning with the i0S7, she’ll no longer have my voice. Perhaps Morgan Freeman’s?

DOCUMENT B

Well-Intentioned Uses of Technology Can Go Wrong
Joi Ito is the director of the MIT Media Lab, a research laboratory devoted to the integration of technology, art, and design.

UPDATED DECEMBER 5, 2016, 3:21 AM

The bulk of today’s artificial intelligence research focuses on machine learning, where engineers “train” machines to augment the collective intelligence of our governments, markets, and society. This “extended intelligence,” or E. I., will likely become the dominant form of A. I.

Here’s the rub: The algorithms that create E. I. are trained by humans and can propagate the same biases that plague society, perpetuating them under the guise of “smart machines.” Take, for instance, predictive policing algorithms used to determine which neighborhoods should be more heavily patrolled for criminal activity, or who should be classified as a terrorist. Unless we embed ethical and moral grounding, technology meant to advance our well-being could, in fact, end up amplifying the worst aspects of our society.

Well-intentioned uses of developing technologies can go wrong. In 2003 I co-authored a paper that predicted that an open internet would play a significant role in democratizing society and fostering peace. Later, in the early days of the Arab Spring, it felt as though the internet had indeed helped spark the uprising. But as the internet has increasingly become a place for bigotry and malicious trolling as well as a platform for organizations like ISIS to advance a wave of hatred, I wonder, “What hath the Internet wrought?” I have similar concerns about the development and deployment of E. I.

It’s absolutely essential for us to develop a framework for how our ethics, government, educational system, and media evolve in the age of machine intelligence. We must initiate a broader, in-depth discussion about how society will co-evolve with this technology, and we must build a new kind of computer science that creates technologies that are not only “smart,” but are also socially responsible. If we allow E. I. to develop without thoughtfully managing how it integrates with and affects society, it could be used to amplify dangerous biases and entities. And we may not notice until it’s too late.

anddd... you know what yall get it write an essay boo

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 03:00, Bearboy5957
Read the excerpt from "save the redwoods."another, one of the finest in the grove, more than three hundred feet high, was skinned alive to a height of one hundred and sixteen feet from the ground and the bark sent to london to show how fine and big that calaveras tree was—as sensible a scheme as skinning our great men would be to prove their greatness. which  best  describes how the excerpt appeals to readers’ emotions? the excerpt provides facts about the tree, which impresses readers’ scientific minds. the excerpt describes how the tree traveled to london, which excites the readers’ sense of adventure. the excerpt compares the tree to a person, which makes readers feel sympathetic toward the tree. the excerpt explains how to skin a tree, which makes readers feel awed at the height of the tree.
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 03:40, alyxxboothe
Which two of these excerpts from homer’s odyssey depict the gods’ involvement in mortal affairs?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 04:00, QueeeenUknown7437
You visit two websites about inventions of the 21st century. one has .edu in the url address and the other has .com. which site is more likely to be credible and why? (6 points) select one: a. the .edu site is more likely to be credible because all .com sites are trying to sell you something. b. the .edu site is more likely to be credible because its domain is a university or other school type. c. the .com site is more likely to be credible because all .edu sites are personal college student blogs. d. the .com site is more likely to be credible because its owners review all the content before publishing.
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 09:30, newjersey4015
You will read a story and a prompt. then, you will organize your own story ideas in the narrative organization chart. view the grading rubric as you complete your work. this is your guide to a super submission. read the narrative "grounded."in the narrative organization chart, plan your own story based on this writing prompt. important: save the organizer, immediately, to your computer or drive. you are writing a continuation of the story, “grounded,” so be sure to use some details from this story as you organize your narrative. complete each box on your narrative organization chart. save your work to your computer or drive. submit your work in 03.02 planning your narrative. if you cannot save your chart, you can type the information into a document and submit.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Challenge yall do this Part II:
Write a logical, cohesive, multi-paragraph argument that addr...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 04:10