Passage 1: Kathy has been at our company for 23 years, and now that she's retiring, we need to give her the best goodbye party ever. Just think back on all the ways Kathy has made your life better. If you're like most of us, her smile has cheered you up on a rough day. Or she's jumped in to help you meet a deadline you were about to miss. Maybe you just liked stopping by her desk to share a laugh and a piece of candy from her candy jar. However Kathy has touched your life, let's show her how much she has meant to this company Passage 2: We must make sure that Kathy's retirement party reflects her long service to the company. Kathy joined our firm in 1991 as an assistant in the mail room, where she helped process letters and packages coming into our office. From there, she was promoted to file clerk, a role in which she contributed greatly to the efficiency of our storage systems. Finally, in 2008, Kathy became the front desk receptionist - the face of the company and a helpful resource for employees and visitors alike. Please join us in honoring Kathy. Which statement best compares the ways that the two arguments use appeals? A. Passage 1 appeals to logic by giving reasons for appreciating Kathy, while passage 2 appeals to emotion by taking a professional tone. B. Passage 1 appeals to the audience's emotional connection with Kathy, while passage 2 appeals to logic by giving facts about Kathy's career. C. Passage 1 appeals to ethics by mentioning Kathy's candy jar, while passage 2 appeals to logic by explaining facts about the company. D. Passage 1 is based on emotion that is not backed up with facts, while passage 2 is based on ethical appeals because of the speaker's role as company president.