What stylistic choices does the article use to convince readers that Shelley's Frankenstein is still relevant 200 years later? (hint: think of literary devices and

text structures)

Your answer

Answer and Explanation:

Hello. You did not inform the article to which this question refers, which may leave the textual evidence a little inaccurate, but I will try to help you in the best possible way.

"Frankenstein" is still relevant for a number of factors. One of the main factors is the allegories and metaphors that the author used to show our human condition and complexity in relation to technology, family, knowledge, acceptance and loneliness.

The author is able to show, through Victor Frankenstein, how excited we are about scientific and technological advances, but how we are afraid of the changes that these advances provide, because these changes can turn against us and provide an ugly reality that we do not want to face, but even so we are not able to contain the curiosity in forming the new. In other words, the author exposes our ambiguity as human beings and how this promotes complex and often destructive relationships.

This is all highly current and manages to move our reasoning and vision of ourselves, which makes the book something visionary and current, even though it was written more than 200 years ago.

d is the best answer for this question.

i suggest it is anadiplosis