English, 25.11.2020 18:10, harleyandpope90

In this section, Grendel is made to seem totally evil, with no redeeming qualities. The narrator tells us that he "relished his savage war on the Danes"
and sought no peace, killing indiscriminately and at will. Do you think that a
character this unilaterally evil is an effective antagonist? What would happen
if Grendel had a "backstory" that gave him a legitimate motive for his
behaviors? What if he had some sympathetic or redeeming qualities

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: English

English, 20.06.2019 18:04, bernie24

In chapters 34 and 35, tom makes lots of elaborate plans to get jim free. from where has he gotten many of his ideas?

Answers: 3

continue

English, 21.06.2019 23:00, JPU

4friends evenly divided up a nn-slice pizza. one of the friends, harris, ate 11 fewer slice than he received.

Answers: 2

continue

English, 22.06.2019 02:30, eshaesmot12345

Select the correct answer. which groups fought in the trojan war? a. mycenaeans and minoans b. greeks and trojans c. minoans and greeks d. minoans, mycenaeans, and trojans

Answers: 1

continue

English, 22.06.2019 09:30, nees123

Explain what the text says explicitly. reread paragraph 2 of "civil peace." what does this paragraph reveal about jonathan and his family's circumstances? cite textual evidence to support your response.

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

In this section, Grendel is made to seem totally evil, with no redeeming qualities. The narrator te...