How do you think the author views this hill

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

plagiarism is a consequential action, and can result in many bad endings. for instance, you could possibly get expelled from a college or even your own school. you also have the potential of getting your work destroyed. it can also result in expulsion from you academic institution, in some cases permanent expulsion. plagiarism can result in legal action; fines and penalties etc.

hope this , and have a good day. c;

answer: b

explanation: i have never watched or read about him but looked it up and it seems the most sensible answer. sorry if it's wrong. ☺