Gladwell is known for weaving together multiple strands of apparently unrelated materials in his work, and this excerpt from David and Goliath is no exception (in fact, the ellipsis marks you see throughout it show where we’ve omitted some of the original chapter’s other strands). To better understand Gladwell’s method, sketch an outline of the cause-and-effect analysis offered here. How effective do you find his ORGANIZATION? How does Gladwell integrate the strands to achieve UNITY?

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.

in   ¨and yet the books¨   by czelaw miloz the tone is positive since it tells us that when we touch a book, it starts to live and the perspective is in the third person and turns once into the first person. in "the rhinoceros" by eugene ionesco the tone is illogical and absurd   and the perspective is in the third person since it is a play.

answer: do you have any options

explanation: