English
English, 20.11.2020 04:40, mahmed78

HELP PLEASE Representative Weaver claims that his bill is motivated by "safety." "Nearly half of all accidents involve people under the age of 21," Representative Weaver claims.
"Raising the driving age," he adds, would mean raising the level of safety on America's roads." But I would ask Representative Weaver the following questions: Do not nearly half
of all accidents involve men? Wouldn't the streets be safer, then, if male drivers were abolished? And what about the percentage of accidents occur on paved roads? Should we do
away with paved roads, too?
Here are some more questions I would like to ask Representative Weaver: If the driving age is raised to 21. what will happen to all the afternoon jobs, the sports, and programs that
require some sort of transportation? What will happen to America's economy (and its spirit) when high schooler students can no longer work at restaurants?
"A teenager behind the wheel is the symbol of American youth," writes author Peter Chacha. What will happen to this symbol if Representative Weaver's plan is approved? Weaver
also claims that a majority of seat belt violations are the fault of the under-21 crowd. But let me ask you this: Do people under the age of 21 really wear their seat belts less often
than older people, or are they just caught more often? We know the police have their eyes on the teenagers, but are they looking at the adults as well?
Select the correct answer
Which supporting claim does the author offer to support the argument?

A. Teenagers need to drive to participate in activities and jobs

B. Teenagers are better drivers than most adults.

C. Teenagers can learn more rules about driving safety

D. Teenagers learn to drive better later by starting young

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 14:30, dolltan
Ronald sees that his employer's stock has grown from $20 a share to $60 a share this year, while most stocks have seen only 5% growth. his employer offers to let him convert a large portion of his salary into stock options. what is not a valid reason to turn down the stock offer? select the best answer from the choices provided. a. stocks with high returns have high volatility, and ronald's company may not grow further. b. ronald may be taxed more for capital gains than he would be for employment income. c. stock options are illiquid, and ronald may not be able to use them to pay for unexpected bills. d. ronald would be committing stock fraud if he exercises the options.
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:30, HOTaco2181
Which example is presented in chronological
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:30, s9227575
Which traits are strongest in your persuasive essay: ideas, organization, voice, word choice, sentence fluency, or conventions?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 02:20, 21580
According to the riddle of the rosetta stone, what problem did both jean-francois champollion and sylvestre de sacy face in their attempts to decipher the writings on the rosetta stone?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
HELP PLEASE Representative Weaver claims that his bill is motivated by "safety." "Nearly half of a...

Questions in other subjects: