Ok, this is VERY stupid, and there is no right or wrong answer, but in order to have freetime back on my chromebook, I have to write a 3 paragraph essay on crockpots. The reason that is what I have to write about them, is because it was in my dad's hand when he was thinking about this deal. I will give 30 points if anyone wants to help me. I'm sorry if this is a waste of time for yall.

I am bad at writing essays but if you go to ¨essay typer¨ it will type the essay for you

lol this is the most random thing ive ever heard but not gonna judge here ya go :)

A slow cooker, also known as a crock-pot (after a trademark owned by Sunbeam Products but sometimes used generically in the English-speaking world), is a counter top cooking appliance used to simmer at a lower temperature than other cooking methods like baking, boiling, and frying. It is used for unattended cooking for many hours of dishes that would otherwise be boiled, like pot roast, soups, stews and other dishes including beverages, desserts and dips. A wide variety of dishes can be prepared in slow cookers, including ones typically made quickly, such as cocoa and bread.

A basic slow cooker consists of a lidded oval cooking pot made of glazed ceramic or porcelain, surrounded by a housing, usually metal (like stainless steel), containing an electric heating element to cook the food. The lid itself is often made of glass, and seated in a indent in the pot edge. Condensed vapor collects in the groove and provides a low-pressure seal to the atmosphere. The contents of a crock pot are effective at atmospheric pressure, despite the water vapor generated inside the pot. A slow cooker is quite different from a pressure cooker and has no danger of a sudden pressure release or explosion.

To use a slow cooker, the you place raw food and a liquid, such as water or broth in the slow cooker. Some cooking recipes call for pre-heated liquid. You should put the lid on the slow cooker and turn it on. Some cookers automatically switch from cooking to warming (maintaining the temperature at 71–74 °C (160–165 °F) after a set time, or after the internal temperature of the food reaches a specified value, so as to not burn. This concludes my random essay on slow cookers, aka crockpots.

ieoiw what en the: enswer is b

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.