How did Countee Cullen and James Baldwin differ in their criticism of Hughes's work?

Cullen claimed that Hughes' writing focused on American life, but ignored the African heritage of African Americans and believed that this was a disservice. Baldwin, on the other hand, circled the simple language adopted by Hughes in his poems, which, according to Baldwin, presented weak, irrelevant and meaningless agendas.

Explanation:

Cullen, Baldwin and hughes were American writers very committed to the causes of civil rights and the difficulties that African-Americans suffered in a racist and prejudiced American society. Although both authors used the same themes, they approached them in different ways and with different approaches, which meant that they often did not agree with each other's work and form of writing, which generated many literary criticisms from each other.

People are known to have different views.  Cullen believed that Hughes' writing is mostly based on American life and as such, he did neglect the African heritage of African Americans.

He also believed that this serves as a harm or wrong action.  

James Baldwin also spoke on the simple language used by Hughes in his poems. He believed that it was weak form of language used, not needed and therefore is of no meaning.

Countee was known to have lived from 1903-46. He was an American poet in the Harlem Renaissance. His famous poems are known as "Yet Do I Marvel" and "Incident".

James Arthur Baldwin is a very respected American writer and activist. Baldwin's works has act as an aid to raise public awareness on racial oppression.

Learn more about Countee Cullen from

link

theres no poem include that