SOURCE 1: Rafters of Nostalgia is a strange movie that I hated from beginning to end. For one, the opening scene is not really a scene at all
because the camera just focuses on an old urn resting in the corner of
a dusty cottage for a good 10 minutes. No actors, no action, no
nothing. Just urn. BORING!

SOURCE 2: Rafters of Nostalgia is a work of quiet genius that defies
trends in modern movies. You won't see any explosions or superheroes
here. Its opening scene forces the viewer to gaze upon an urn sitting in
the corner of a house for an uncomfortable 10 minutes, providing an
exhilarating opportunity to question the decreasing attention span of
modern life.

Which statement best synthesizes information from both sources?

The answer is C. Unique movie watching experiance

Explanation:

a-p-e-x

warren buffett- the oracle of omaha warren buffett came from a normal type of family in nebraska. when hew as young, he understood the value of investing money and gaining interest on that investment. he strived hard at several jobs, but what made him one of the wealthiest men in the world was his gift for allocating capital within a free market system. warren buffett is an example of a man whose wealth is owed largely to the free enterprise system. buffett was able to allocate his money however he wanted, investing in businesses that he thought could compete effectively. without the free market system, he would not have the right to invest however he wanted, and would not have become so wealthy.

i guess you are missing the idea that has to be supported, am i right?