Write a annotation for... ( PLEASE IT'S A PRACTICE EOG !! ) 3 sentences plz. Ahead of Jim, Chad’s struggles were getting him nowhere. Jim maneuvered himself back the way he’d come so that he was close to his cousin. He tugged at Chad’s foot to show him he wasn’t alone, but misreading the signal, the other boy began to push and struggle more wildly than before. Because of his kicking, Jim couldn’t get close enough to try and dig him out. Jim felt his panic level shoot up again and once more forced himself to remain calm. He was sure Chad’s air tank had become wedged. He couldn’t cut the air tank free either, because Chad was too far away to use the extra regulator on Jim’s tank. If only there were a way to send his cousin a message—but perhaps there was! Jim grabbed Chad’s legs and pushed down hard. Then, he began tapping out the old code they’d used when they were kids—two taps, then three, then one—lie low, wait! Over and over Jim tapped the code on Chad’s legs. Would his cousin understand the message? Several tense seconds passed.

Then Chad stopped thrashing and struggling. He’d remembered the code! Jim began to dig under Chad’s now motionless legs. He then pushed as close as he could to the other boy and began to fiddle with his cousin’s air tank. He found that if he pushed the tank down a little way, he could drag Chad back a few inches. Gently, carefully, Jim began to do just that. Dig, maneuver the air tank, pull—Jim lost track of time as he repeated the exercise over and over. Carefully, patiently, he worked until he’d managed to pull his cousin free from the narrowest part of the cave. Finally, Chad was free! Jim pushed himself backward until he was out of the cave and in the open sea. Chad followed him and gestured upward. Jim wanted to shoot up to the surface, too. He glanced at his watch; they’d been down for 59 minutes.

sorry i can't understand your question so i can't answer it sorry

answer: d.she abandons people when they least expect it.

in the monk's tale, we encounter seventeen stories that relate historical events. all of these stories have tragic commonalities. they tell the stories of heroes who, despite their success in life, all met sad ends. the monk blames these sad outcomes on fortune. one of fortune's traits is that she abandons people when they least expect it. this is one of the most common themes of medieval tragedies.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this