Read the following passage from Douglass's speech: Let me ask, if it be not somewhat singular that, if the
Constitution were intended to be, by its framers and
adopters, a slave holding instrument, why neither slavery,
slaveholding, nor slave can be found anywhere in it. What
would be thought of an instrument, drawn up, legally drawn
up, for the purpose of entitling the city of Rochester to a
track of land, in which no mention of the land was made?
What is the purpose of this analogy?
A. To underscore the connection between the Constitution and
Douglass's speech, by showing that the same line of reasoning
appears in other settings
B. To show that Douglass is a logical thinker by showcasing a valid
critique of the Constitution and its position on slavery
C. To show that Douglass is sympathetic to the needs of landowners
but still feels strongly about the need for abolition
O D. To highlight Douglass's capacity for critical thinking by calling into
question the concept of ownership altogether, be it of land, people,
or things

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

no

b

explanation:

#1  sara was always tasked with selecting birthday presents for her friends and family because everyone admired her  impeccable taste. 

impeccable (adj): perfect, flawless

#2  they moved to the united states many years ago, but their  insular  attitudes made it difficult for them to socialize. 

insular (adj): isolated; separate

#3  the professor explained the  semantic  relationship between the two nouns used in the sentence. 

semantic (adj): related to words or the meanings of words 

happy to : )