Is democracy profitable to everyone in society

Democracy is not profitable to everyone in society.

Read related link on:

link

The answer is below

Explanation:

What is democracy? It is simply a means of selecting a leader based on majority votes, or through some selected representatives in the republic or indirect democracy. However, this does not outright translate to profitability to everyone or citizens of a country.

Through democracy, the country may still vote for incompetent leaders. There is also the issue of voting out a competent leader, issue of stability of continuation of policies that may benefit citizens, which may be discontinued by subsequent leaders.

Hence, Democracy is not profitable for everyone, and here are the reasons:

1. Inequality: there are still social and income inequalities even in societies where democracy is practiced. This inequality favors the rich among the citizens, and with their wealth, they influence the choice of people that will be in power and the eventual policies they make which empower the rich more.

2. Poverty: while democracy is supposed to reduce poverty through social equality, the inherent corrupt practices and favoritism or nepotism among the public office holders is now contributing to the level of poverty among the lower class of the citizens, thereby increasing the division in the general level of inequalities among people.

3. Quality education: for most countries, especially countries in Africa that are practicing democracy, the quality of education is only getting worse. Even in America, good public schools are not getting better, with research showing that students who attend a private school have a probability of having better university access and career opportunities after graduation.

4. Social justice: democracy is supposed to give every citizen equal access to justice, wealth, health, and opportunities regardless of their social and political class. But this is not reality. The rich have access to better health facilities, can acquire the finest of legal practitioners available, and access to business opportunities, even despite democracy being practiced.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

some attention getter quotes to support your thesis regarding brain work could be the following: :

a. storage capacity of your brain is virtually unlimited.

b. your brain produces sufficient electricity to light-up a small bulb.

c. different brain circuits are involved with reading aloud or silently.

d. your brain by itself does not feel pain.

e. reading allows your brain to download info directly.

f. brains of two musicians performing together can synchronize.