Can someone write a Summary of “the raven and the first men: the beginnings of the Haida”

Into this class [creation myths] we include records of such "mishaps" as that related by different Eskimo tribes of the cheat Father Raven—Tulungersaq—who, as per an Apatac "telling," is a "blessed life power" hunching in the primordial murkiness who all of a sudden stirs and starts to move about. In the end, Father Raven plants the world's first vegetation. One day, to his awesome astonish, the main man pushes out of a pea pod and mankind's history starts. In reality, swindler divine beings like Raven much of the time lay their hands upon antiquated matter planning a certain something and creating another. "There is a telling," starts a Coyote story from America's betray Southwest, of how Coyote coincidentally put the stars in paradise when he shook open a hallowed pocket looking for fortune. This topic may likewise be found among various stories from people groups running from Central Asia to Central Europe, including the old Siberians, Voguls, and Rumanians. In Vogul and Rumanian custom, for instance, Satan unwittingly speeds God's formation of Earth when he lays his hooks upon it with an end goal to demolish it. Growth and conjunction stories, then, show the innovative intensity of primal matter. Any activity, whether that of wind or wave, or the soonest stirrings of a divine being or fallen angel, unleashes the profitable power resting in the primordial profound.

wonky   sloppy   foggy  

donky kong! jk

oh yeah yeah   hope this oh yeah yeah

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war