Which reason would best refute the counterclaim? Bob Dylan’s lyrics are just as effective without musical accompaniment

Dylan has written many enduring and received many awards for his musical achievements

Explanation:

Only die hard fans and the uninformed would argue that Bob Dylan lyrics are literature

This is wrong because anybody can argue his lyrics are literature, not just his fans.

It is impossible to separate song lyrics from the music that accompanies them

That is not true at all. I sing for my school and we practice with only a metronome to make sure we're on beat.

Sing lyrics are no better than childish nonsense without the music that accompanies them

That's not true at all, because as long as you sing the same music, with or without the background music, it's still the same words. Also, that's an opinion which cannot be proven making it an invalid answer.

Dylan has written many enduring and received many awards for his musical achievements

This is a fact that can be proven, and this is true! This proves his lyrics are as effective without musical accompaniment.

I hope this helped! Please mark me as Brainliest!!!

a-he encouraged islamic schools to introduce greek texts.

d-he invited greek scholars to teach their texts to the locals.

explanation:

the transmission of the greek classics to latin western europe during the middle ages was a key factor in the development of intellectual life in western europe.[1] interest in greek texts and their availability was scarce in the latin west during the earlier middle ages, but as traffic to the east increased so did western scholarship.

mark brainliest and have a great day!