At a get-together at Modotti's home, Kahlo saw Diego Rivera again. Later, he did not remember the shy young girl quietly watching the crowd of celebrities. But Kahlo was fascinated by the impetuous Rivera. In many ways they were alike. Both were outrageous pranksters and born masters of exaggeration. . . . "I began to be very interested in him, in spite of the fear I had of him," she later recalled. That interest would turn into the love of her life. Which detail from this excerpt best supports the opinion that Diego Rivera was a fun and spontaneous person? Kahlo saw Rivera at Modotti's home. Kahlo and Rivera both liked playing pranks. Kahlo and Rivera were much alike. Kahlo was shy at their first meeting.

The detail from the excerpt that best supports the opinion that Diego Rivera was a fun and spontaneous person is:

Kahlo and Rivera both liked playing pranks.

Explanation:

Let's find the correct option through elimination:

1.  Kahlo saw Rivera at Modotti's home. --> Up to this point in the excerpt, we know nothing about Rivera. This is clearly not enough to determine his personality and character.

2. Kahlo and Rivera both liked playing pranks. --> This is the correct option. We would assume a person who enjoys playing pranks is both fun and spontaneous. Pranksters are often outgoing people, who enjoy being the center of others' attention and who cannot stand boredom.

3. Kahlo and Rivera were much alike. --> This detail alone does not mean much. It is only when the author explains they are both pranksters that we can get a glimpse of their characters.

4. Kahlo was shy at their first meeting. --> This detail describes Kahlo, but not Rivera. Therefore, it is incorrect.

answer: lol you have autism

explanation: lol you have autism

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).