Compare and contrast close and distant narrative styles, explaining an instance where the use of each would be appropriate and effective. your answer should be at least 150 words.
like what is this?

Narrative distance refers to the difference between the character's points of view and the reader's point of view. Close and Distant narrative styles are both third-person styles of writing. Distant Narrating would be when the narrator is outside of the events of the story. A close narrator is one that would take part in the events of a story. I think it would be appropriate to use Distant narrating when you just need to get a quick overview of the story. This would be effective in this way because it would be easier to tell the whole story. It would be appropriate to use Close narrating when you want to get closer to the emotions of the characters. You couldn't effectively get close to the character's emotions from a distance. This would b effective because you would get insight into the emotions and thoughts of the narrator taking part in these events.

because of all the immigration, america became one big melting pot. the diversity of cultures from all over the world made america somewhat divided as well. people that immigrated stayed with their kind, and their traditions, while native born americans stayed with their kind and their traditions. normally, people born in american scorned the immigrants as well. the new religions also divided america. in summary, it took away from the american culture and identified america as the "melting pot."

the answer is the second one.