The last section of the story is a flash forward. Readers must infer what happens in the time between Sergei's conversation with the fish and Yoni's final report on his video. Is this time sequence effective, or would it have been better to know the details about Sergei's decision?

it was not effective

Explanation:

This ultimately depends on the author's intention when writing the story. By making this time jump the author is relying on the reader to piece together the events through the few pieces of information provided. This makes the reader think and arrive at the conclusion through their own investigative work, which can be rewarding and fun but at the same time can leave some readers confused. If the events were explained thoroughly and the flash-forward removed then all the readers would know exactly what happened and how the story arrived at the conclusion. Therefore, I would say no it was not effective, and that it would have been better to know the details of Sergei's decision.

the transfiguration of jesus is an event reported in the new testament when god: the meeting place of the temporal and the eternal, with jesus himself as the connecting point,

pls follow me

call me     2167727145                       ee