I will mark brainliest if is right Supporting Question: How should we interpret the status of women at the time of the Constitution’s creation? Directions: Answer the Supporting Question of the inquiry in an evidence-based paragraph based around an argumentative claim.

You will be assessed and receive feedback on the following Cognitive Skills:

Argumentative Claim

Selection of Evidence

Write your answer here:

bhai mark me brainlist answer please follow me

Explanation:

“But what if women indeed were mentioned? Would we have to change our interpretation of the place of women in the Constitution?”

Several years ago, a friend who was editing a special issue of a history journal asked me to contribute an article about women and the Constitution. Having just completed some research on women and The Federalist, I knew the technique that I would use: Assuming that women were nowhere discussed in the debates in the Constitutional Convention, I would look at the use of gendered language for clues about what the Founders thought about women and their place in the government they were creating. Like most other historians, I believed that the available political ideologies–republicanism and liberalism–excluded women. Republicanism extolled self-sacrifice for the common good, while liberalism vaunted the individual. But neither ideology, received wisdom held, thought that a woman could be a citizen, with a politically significant self, either to sacrifice or to be served by government.

i am a strong (insert gender here) my father and his brother were to, they were killed not by the cold, not by the bears or wolves that roam our streets at night, but by the   bolsheviks. we must stand up and fight communism or we all end up dead, starved dehydrated, enslaved. the time is now we must fight. lenin is a dangerous man but he can be stopped. so my comrades we shall siege there weapons tonight on ward. (rides away with ak(not invented yet) and sword in hand while on bear into snowstorm)