The last section of the story is a flash forward. readers must infer what happens in the intervening time between sergei's conversation with the fish and yoni's final report on his video. is this structure effective, or would it have been better to know the details about sergei's decision? explain.

This structure is effective.

Explanation:

As we can see in the question above, the last section of the story happens in an accelerated way, causing a reflection of the bed about the conversation of sergei with the fish and the final report of yoni in his video. This type of structure is totally effective, because it leaves the reader prompted to find facts that will allow him to reach a conclusion for himself and find out if Sergei's decision was correct and if it was effective that she used her last request to save Yoni. .