Compare and contrast William Tell with Philoxenus.
HELP!!!

In the start of their parts in both stories, both of them are completely innocent. Then, they both get punished for something they said. Tell has no choice in not risking his son's life, but Philoxenus has a choice to lie and escape. Tell is skilled with a bow, but Philoxenus is skilled with wirting. Both are honest and wouldn't tell a lie. Tell sticks up to his rights not to bow to the hat, but Philoxenus does not by letting Dionysius put him in jail for an unwelcome opinion, or a truth. Tell's resolution is solved with his skill, but Philoxenus' isn't.

Explanation:

ieoiw what en the: enswer is b

sthe miracle worker  ▾search

home  >   study guides  >   the miracle worker

the miracle worker themeswilliam gibson

themes and meanings

(comprehensive guide to drama)

print  print  document  pdf  list  cite  link  link

there are two central themes in  the miracle worker: that the human spirit can triumph over even the most daunting of disabilities and that a dedicated teacher can transform the lives of those with whom he or she comes into contact. these inspirational themes have long been personified in the widely known true-life relationship between helen keller and annie sullivan, but  the miracle worker  also dramatizes collateral issues that extend beyond the particular case. underlying helen’s process of learning basic principles of what annie terms “obedience” (decorum, etiquette, and hygiene), there are more universal lessons of self-governance—the inculcation of self-restraint instead of willfulness, the development of self-discipline instead of self-indulgence. only when these lessons have been mastered can helen begin to acquire language—which, annie says, “is to the mind more than light is to the eye.”