Argument: Claim, Ground, Warrant Determine the claim, ground and warrant for each paragraph. There may be more than one, so choose the one you can explain the best. Paragraph Claim Analysis: ground (evidence or example) warrant (what inference/assumption would audience understand?) Paragraph #1 Paragraph #2 Paragraph #3: Paragraph #4 Paragraph #5 Paragraph #6 this is for Sinners in the hands of an angry god

the narrator is saying that the old lady made her feel uncomfortable. you know this because they say "i found that rather irksome", "perhaps it was her being so upright and trim", and "i don't think it was that, because i thought that quaintly pleasant." hope this !

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest

all: 19,619

monthly: 467.14

step-by-step explanation:

what were the pronouns? did it use i, me, and my? if so, it was first person. if it had pronouns like you and your it was second person point of view. if it used he, she, and they, it was 3rd person point of view.