Question refers to the article by Oakley. "Why virtual classes can be better than real ones". Correct answer gets brainliest. Thx for the help. 6. More than halfway through her argument, Oakley brings in her personal experience of being “a terrible student” (para. 17). What effect does her narrative have on the argument? What different responses might her various audiences have, depending upon their own experiences? 9. By the end of the essay, it seems clear that Oakley’s audience—particularly other teachers and scientists—are skeptics of online learning. What assumptions does she make about their chief concerns? How effectively does she reassure them and invite them to try developing an online course or course component?