The last section of the story is a flash forward. Readers must infer what happens in the intervening time between Sergei’s conversation with the fish and Yoni’s final report on his video. Is this structure effective, or would it have been better to know the details about Sergei’s decision? Explain.

This structure is effective.

Explanation:

As we can see in the question above, the last section of the story happens in an accelerated way, causing a reflection of the bed about the conversation of sergei with the fish and the final report of yoni in his video. This type of structure is totally effective, because it leaves the reader prompted to find facts that will allow him to reach a conclusion for himself and find out if Sergei's decision was correct and if it was effective that she used her last request to save Yoni.

the correct answer option for this is: false.

explanation:

we are given the following statement 'hawthorne thought of himself as a novelist' which is false.

the truth is that nathaniel hawthorne thought of himself as a romancer, rather than a novelist.

though it is ironic of him of him to consider himself a romancer rather than a novelist despite of the innocent women killings in the salem witch trials which occurred in colonial massachusetts between 1692 and 1693 .