English
English, 05.09.2020 22:01, dreannaevans2

PLEASE HELP! :) There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when men did not know how to kindle fire; and after they learned how to kindle one, it was a long, long time before they learned how to kindle one easily. In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match; but we must remember that the match is one of the most wonderful things in the world, and that it took men thousands of years to learn how to make one. Let us learn the history of this familiar little object, the match. Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble. In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. What information do we get from the bolded paragraph that develops the main idea of the essay? (5 points)
A-How nature started the first fires
B-How humans came up with the idea for matches
C-The need for a new way to create fire
D-The way matches are made

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 03:30, priscillaoliver4487
"first of all, how could they mistake a man for a sasquatch? " which best explains the purpose of this question (from review 2)? a) to illustrate how much the book uses humor b) to show how unbelievable parts of the story are c) to convince the reader that the novel is poorly written d) to highlight the differences between the characters in the novel
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:30, skaterwolf1317
Have you ever thought you understood a person based on a story that you have heard about them? have you ever guessed about a person's personal life because of the clothes they wore? or, have you judged a person because of their friends? although classifying people in this way is typically discouraged, authors deliberately use your preconceived ideas to you form an opinion about the character or to at least have a better understanding. can you think of a time that you made a character call about someone based on external aspects? were you correct, or incorrect? has anyone ever made an incorrect assessment of you based on external aspects? write two paragraphs about it in your journal.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 09:30, yuluvk
In act 5, which of the following seems to carry power in rome? a. violence b. rhetoric c. hope d. defeat
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 10:30, didraga777
Ineed . the passage implies that: a. most jury trials involve violent crimes b. jurors may be surprised by how stressful being in a jury is c. a trial by jury is not a fair way to judge a person’s guilt or innocence d. the people who take jury duty least seriously are the ones who find xperience most stressful
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
PLEASE HELP! :) There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when me...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 05.03.2021 23:10
Konu
Mathematics, 05.03.2021 23:10