English
English, 03.09.2020 09:01, ronaldo22

Question 17 of 24 Read the following sentence:
I can't tell you how many times I have to honk at a driver
who's sitting at a green light texting instead of driving. But
the consequences of texting in a car can be far, far worse.
What would most naturally come next in this argument?
O
A. The definition of "texting" in terms of the device used
B. The writer's further observations of annoying drivers
C. An example of how texting and driving can cost lives
D. A proposal to make phones and small devices illegal
SUBMIT

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 23:00, mccdp55
Write 3 parallel sentences about an animal of your choice
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, ayoismeisalex
Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, naomicervero
Wiesel's speech begins after auschwitz the human condition is not the same nothing will be the same identify where similar language is repeated later in his speech what is the effect of this repetition
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:00, camiserjai1832
Read the argument below and answer the question that follows. all football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. david is a football player. david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. what are the elements of this argument? a. premise: david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. conclusion: david is a football player. b. premise: all football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. conclusion: david is a football player. c. premise: david is a football player. conclusion: david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. d. premise: all football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. david is a football player. conclusion: david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Question 17 of 24 Read the following sentence:
I can't tell you how many times I have to honk...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 23:30
Konu
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 23:30
Konu
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 23:30