How can you tell if a piece of evidence is relevant?

You can tell if evidence is relevant when it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable.

Explanation:  In testing whether evidence is relevant, don’t jump to conclusions. Just because it looks irrelevant at first glance does not mean it has no connection to the claim! Sometimes the connection is there but not direct or obvious. A good technique is to start by assuming the evidence is relevant and then try to figure out how. This trains your mind to spot connections that may be hidden

I hope this helps you :)

from the excerpt from the "the dark game" the reader can infer that folke cronholm was spying for the allied nations.

1.the hosts on two opposing mountains stood,  

2.thick as the foliage of the waving wood;  

3.between them an extensive valley lay,  

4.o'er which the gleaming armour pour'd the day,  

5.when from the camp of the philistine foes,

6. dreadful to view, a mighty warrior rose; in the dire deeds of bleeding battle skill'd,