The Wolf and the Lamb; Aristotle's Rhetoric; Clayton, Edward. to the author of "Aesop's Fables," there are at least two ways the ancient story of the Wolf and the Lamb could have been interpreted by the Greeks of Aristotle's day. 1) What are these two interpretations? 2) What is Edward Clayton's central argument about these interpretations? 3) What rhetorical appeals--ethos, pathos, logos--does Clayton use most effectively to present his case

it is the background information on the characters and setting explained at the beginning of the story. the exposition will often have information about events that happened before the story began. the exposition is often the very first part of the plot.

first of all the mood needs to be defined: it is obviously a mood of deceitful relief and serenity. why? because the cape horn is one of the most violent maritime regions of earth and although it has been left behind, it is a personification of ahab’s delirium and the fact that the end of the passage speaks about it about being “hidden” but “raving” immediately conveys the feeling the calm is not permanent but fleeting.

furthermore, the oxymoron “mild stun'sails” is the first instance of such feeling as the adjective “mild” is associated with “stunned” underscoring the fleeting nature of this “tranquil” moment. and the contrasts keep piling up, with the opposition between “dark den” and “blessed light and air” to end with the final conclusion that leaves the reader with the uneasy knowledge that this is just a reprieve.

line 5 is one of them idk the other one

the yellow wallpaper” examines the oppressive nature of gender roles as they were imposed on women in the late 19th century. the narrator is driven mad by her inability to assert her identity.