How should this excerpt be edited to make it more objective? by including direct quotations from the professor about his knowledge of the gambling ring by interviewing the department chairman and the professor to get both sides of the story by removing the commentary that the professor is most likely involved in the gambling ring by deleting the department chairman's and professor's names from the article

This excerpt can be edited to make it more objective by removing the commentary that the professor is most likely involved in the gambling ring.

An objective passage is a passage that plainly the facts of an event. The personal feelings of the writer are not included in the summary.

In this passage that explains how the Fairview police arrested students involved in a gambling ring, Professor Shuman was a prime suspect.

However, when the writer inserts his feelings that Professor Shuman was involved in the ring despite his refusal, he was not being objective.

Learn more about objectivity here:

link

by removing the commentary that the professor is most likely involved in the gambling ring.

Explanation:

The given excerpt highlights more about Professor Shuman. His involvement in gambling has been more focused rather than on the activity and the ills of the event. In this way, the real issue of the gambling process gets blurred. In order to make the report more objective, the commentary focusing on the professor being involved in the gambling needs to be removed.

maby a teacher

i just dont know what you have it is not showing up on the screen