Read the sentence from a summary of common sense, by thomas paine.

i believe that common sense presents arguments to convince the colonists of the need to free themselves from british rule.

how does this sentence violate the principles of objectivity in writing a summary?
it contains an emotional appeal.
it includes loaded language.
it provides false or misleading information.
it brings the writer into the sentence.

Which link would readers of this dictionary entry click if they wanted more information about the historical origins of the word language

Read the sentence. the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, costing only about the same as a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be printed and still look good, it made loads of money. which best revises this sentence to create a more formal style and tone? *the great wave was as cheap as buying a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be made and still look great, people started making piles of money. *the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, costing about the same as a double of noodles. since mass quantities could be produced and still look exquisite, it became highly profitable to sell. *the great wave cost next to nothing, practically the same as a double of noodles. since mass quantities could be produced and still look awesome, it became highly profitable to sell. *the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, similar to buying a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be made that still looked amazing, those who sold it made tons of money.

Let freedom ring from the snow capped rockies of colorado what is the rhetorical device? a. imagery b. simile c. anaphor d oxymoron