Please help I need this quick Topic question: Should violent video games be banned?

Instructions: You will organize an argument for banning violence from teens’ video games because violent video games are harmful. Read the evidence below and then organize your argument. (Copy and paste the outline below into the feedback box and add your information.)

Argument Organizer

Claim:

In your own words

Reason 1:

In your own words

Support for Reason 1:

Quote from the evidence below

Reason 2:

In your own words

Support for Reason 2:

Quote from the evidence below

Counterclaim:

What is the opposing point of view

Rebuttal Support:

Quote from the evidence below

Conclusion Clincher:

Negative effects that will occur if your readers do not follow your claim

EVIDENCE 1

Negative Effects of Violent Video Games

In studies conducted by neuroscientists, it was found that teens who regularly play violent video games have lower rates of success in school than teens who do not play violent video games. The same parents who ban violent televisions shows from being watched in their homes must also be careful about the types of video games their teens play. Teens love their games, but their future is at stake.

Excerpt from “Family First Magazine”

EVIDENCE 2

Negative Effects of Violent Video Games

Fights among best friends and disagreements with peers are a natural part of a teen’s daily life, but studies have consistently shown that teens who play violent video games on a regular basis are more aggressive with peers than teens who do not play these games. Is society willing to ban these violent games to support teen relationships?

Excerpt from “Adolescent Health Sociology Journal

EVIDENCE 3

Negative Effects of Violent Video Games

A study conducted by teen psychologists found that teens who regularly play violent video games are more prone to having fights and confrontations with adults at home, school and work. Teens want the freedom to play games of their choice, but they need to be aware of the dangers.

Study by Anderson, Gentile and Buckley (2007)

here is what i typed

Explanation:

TOPIC:  SHOULD VIDEO GAMES BE BANNED?

Video games always provide a great pass time activity for children. There are many types of games and they are so addictive that when a child is not controlled, they can spend all their time playing the games. The game a child plays can be a good or a bad thing in their life. For example, children who learn how to play chess online as a video game at a young age usually show signs of high levels of intelligence. However, the same case does not apply for most video games. Due to this reason, I think video games should be banned.

The effects of video games are as varied as the number of the games. One effect that is common with all of them is their addiction. This can be a terrible thing because a child might not do any productive activity whenever at home. This means that they do not study when at home or even do their assignments. Consequently, their performance at school definitely decreases. Moreover, the child could sacrifice development of their talent such as attending a music class just for the purpose of playing a violent game.

Another effect that has caused ripples among parents and the society in general is the possible violent behaviour in kids who play such games. Several studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between such games and violent behaviour in children. Controlled experiments place little emphasis on this relationship. The obtained results show that the negative effects of such games are quite minimal. It has been observed that violence displayed on television such as in action movies or video games that create death scenes has more chances of  leading to violence in children than regular games. However, it is important to note that when a child plays a violent game, they are likely to experience some mental effects. These effects include an increase of both heart rate and brain activity.

Hence, there is also an observation regarding these games and their players where children who are naturally aggressive prefer playing this type of games to others. This observation can unlikely lower the chances of violent games leading to violent behaviour in children. When interviewed, some kids who play this type of games say that they are not negatively affected by the games. This is definitely backed up by their violent behaviour already caused by the video game which they haven’t noticed yet.

Therefore, it is safe to say that non-violent games not on a device rarely lead to violent behaviour in children compared to online video games that are violent or not violent. However, they are not beneficial to the children because of their addictive nature, which can destroy a child’s growth. As previously said, video games can be dangerous and affect children’s health and respect. In conclusion from the 3 statements I made previously, this is why I think video games should be banned.

he correct answer is choice c. promoters of ufc events were eager to work with state athletic commissions, without public pressure being a necessary inducement.

? ? what can you explain this to me i am so confused