1. Do you believe this story is nonsense for nonsense’s sake, or are there deeper, symbolic interpretations that can be made about Carroll’s work? Explain.

This question is about "Alice in Wonderland"

I believe that Carroll's work was not nonsense for nonsense’s sake, but that it includes many logical and playful concepts in order to stimulate the imagination of children.

Explanation:

You should already know that Carroll was a professor of mathematics and that he was a great academic in the field of logic, being an individual who had a certain love for puzzles that involved logical reasoning and the use of mathematical concepts.

When writing "Alice in Wonderland" he used these elements, but in a fun way and that instigated the children's imagination, so they would develop their reasoning in a way that would attract them, with funny, playful things that seem to make no sense at all . I believe that this is the real meaning of this work, I do not believe that Carroll thought of creating deep and philosophical meanings, nor even writing a work that was just nonsense for nonsense’s sake, but that was stimulating and exciting.

just to , the answer is b on edge

whats the question you didnt post a question

explanation: