1. Do you believe this story is nonsense for nonsense’s sake, or are there deeper, symbolic interpretations that can be made about Carroll’s work? Explain.

This question is about "Alice in Wonderland"

I believe that Carroll's work was not nonsense for nonsense’s sake, but that it includes many logical and playful concepts in order to stimulate the imagination of children.

Explanation:

You should already know that Carroll was a professor of mathematics and that he was a great academic in the field of logic, being an individual who had a certain love for puzzles that involved logical reasoning and the use of mathematical concepts.

When writing "Alice in Wonderland" he used these elements, but in a fun way and that instigated the children's imagination, so they would develop their reasoning in a way that would attract them, with funny, playful things that seem to make no sense at all . I believe that this is the real meaning of this work, I do not believe that Carroll thought of creating deep and philosophical meanings, nor even writing a work that was just nonsense for nonsense’s sake, but that was stimulating and exciting.

true

explanation:

in this passage from chapter 6 of "animal farm", by george orwell, what the author is ridiculing in this passage is the frivolity of some rules.

clover, the mare, believes she remembers that the fourth commandment forbade sleeping in beds because it was something that humans did. snowball, napoleon, and the pigs are brain-workers who look after the welfare of the farm. they are the obvious leaders because they are smart, and so they are entitled to eat the best food and sleep in beds. it is squealer, who says these lines making the difference between sleeping with sheets, what humans do, and sleeping in beds, what pigs do. the unwillingness to question authority makes the oppressed to obey without thinking.