1. What kind of evidence does Nash include to support his claims? Do you find it credible? 2. What evidence does Nash provide that suggests humans really are hurting other species' natural rights to self-realize? Do you find the evidence Nash provides convincing? 3. Supply other examples of the consequences of human actions on our planet that Nash doesn't discuss? 4. Does Nash discuss any benefits of civilization? If so, what are they? 5. What are some other future scenarios that Nash doesn't discuss? 6. What groups are likely to disagree with Nash's viewpoint? Why? 7. Are you persuaded that humans will have to reorient themselves in the future in order to achieve a more hamonious relationship with the natural world? Why or why not?