Which sentence most accurately evaluates the spoken tone of Churchill's "Their Finest Hour"? A. Churchill's emphasis on Britain's inflexible resolve makes victory seem like a foregone conclusion.

B. Churchill's sarcasm makes it appear that he's daring Germany to attack.

C. Churchill's tone sounds depressed despite his words calling for determined duty.

D. Churchill's bold tone encourages everyone to stand up and be counted.

C. Churchill's tone sounds depressed despite his words calling for determined duty.

Explanation:

The finest hour is a speech delivered by British prime minister Winston Churchill in 1940.

Churchill Knew his forces were quickly losing morale, he reminded his listeners that a number of British military force have led successful attacks alongside the French.

In the speech, he lamented that the British people would give up and let the losses of so many Europeans be in vain. He stated that the British people were responsible for saving the people suffering throughout Europe, especially the ones that they have promised to protect.

He warned against a Dark Age in which Hitler takes over the world.

Also, In this speech,he rallied for a future where Britain and the Commonwealth have endured for a thousand years, and men would look back on the Second World War and recall it as “their finest hour.”

i love romeo and xo

it is a!

not b because i don't see how this would make them look dangerous..

not c because that just doesn't make sense..

and not d because this too doesn't make sense, it does not really put the audience on edge in my opinion.

a makes the most sense, romeo's statement that in staying to speak to juliet he is risking his life, leads the audience to worry about his safety. obviously if he says that if he stays, he will be at risk, so of course this makes the audience worry for his safety!

answer is a) romeo's statement that in staying to speak to juliet he is risking his life, leads the audience to worry about his safety.

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest