Why did w. e.b dubois call marcus garvey \"the most dangerous enemy of the negro race in america\"? . a) dubois felt that garvey was too accommodating to white society. b) dubois believed that garvey placed too much emphasis on education. c) dubois felt that garvey's belief in black separatism worked against the struggle for social equality. d) dubois believed that garvey was operating businesses that exploited african american workers.

C) DuBois felt that Garvey's belief in black separatism worked against the struggle for social equality.

Explanation:

William Edward Burghardt Du Bois was an abolitionist and a civil rights activist who advocated for the full equality of the African American people. He was a part of the opposing forces against the Atlanta Compromise, an agreement started by Booker T. Washington which gives the whites authority over the slaves in the Southern States in exchange for proper education of the slaves.

Marcus Mosiah Garvey Jr. was political activist from Jamaica who believes in the Pan Africanism, the unification of all African people in the world. he believes that only through this can the African people be united and safe on their own.

W.E.B DuBois labelled Marcus Garvey as "The most dangerous enemy of the Negro race in America" for his belief in trying to unify the Africans only and not work for their equality in the nations they reside. DuBois thinks that this view to unify them is a promotion of racial separation and will not be essential for their equality among the people they live. Instead, DuBois believes that it is more important to strive for equality rather than separatism.

beginner

government is strong when they have the ability to persuade those they govern to believe government has enough power to force them or should be forcing them to do government’s will.

when enough of the citizenry do not believe government can force them or should force them to do its bidding, government has lost or will lose its strength and power to coerce.

when enough of the citizenry do believe government can force or should force them to do its bidding, they become passive at the least or actively pro-government and repeat government’s own rhetoric to pass on what they have been persuaded by government’s propaganda.

a true majority isn’t always needed to govern or to stop government. many times all that is needed is a strong minority. if a determined 30% of the population rises up against government in a concerted effort to bring it down, this size minority usually will succeed as long as those actively opposing the minority are less in force than the minority. so if 41% of the population sits at home watching tv rooting for one side or the other, they don’t matter. it’s the active parties who make a difference.

i it is b. but if its not sorry