I will mark you brainalist Why did Papi trade the painting job for Merci's tuition? In the article of sol painting inc

Papi traded the painting job for Merci's tuition because they wanted to afford a "more structured learning environment" for her. Seaward Pines was their choice but they couldn't easily afford. Therefore, the dad had to trade the painting job for Merci's tuition.

Explanation:

Merci was a young girl who talked more about her father's business than she does for her academics. She is already daydreaming of becoming the next CEO after her dad. So, since her parent's wanted a more structured learning environment for her, they decided to put her in Seaward Pines.

Her brother, Roli has been in the school, he has been a striaght-A champ. But Merci manages to get a C. So, she needed a better learning environment.

Her dad, known as Papi decided to paint the school's gym in exchange for Merci's tuition.

"Sol Painting, Inc." is a story by a Cuban American writer known as Meg Medina.

In SOL PAINTING, INC., by Meg Medina, Papi trades the painting job for Merci's tuition because the family doesn´t have enough money to pay for it.

Explanation:

This becomes evident in several references to their economic status, such as Mami´s depiction of Papi´s job as not profitable enough to be called a business, the poor condition of their van, and the fact that no other kids from their neighborhood attend the prestigious Seaward Pines.

By the end, Roli explains to Merci that their father wants her to attend a good school so she can have better opportunities than he did.

write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrators’ schools and explain how their schools shape their perspectives toward the hijab. cite evidence from the text to support your ideas.

copy and paste answer:

two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrator's schools would be this, the one school with the veil is the one school were the students were forced to wear the veils, and they did not know why they had to wear the veils. the girl student writing the story was not like the other students, she didn't care. in the second school there was a lot of hostile activities going on throughout the school. most of the students were upset and this, including the author, but she was trying to look and the good side of things.  

overall, both schools had something that the students or most of the students did not like or appreciate. what you can learn from these stories is that life will never be exactly how you may want it to be. complaining about your lifestyle will only make matters worse or at least feel worse in the long run. that's happens to be the information you can interpret from these two stories.

appeal to ethos is your answer.