English
English, 31.05.2020 22:58, darrenturner

3. What does Douglass state he does NOT need to prove to the audience?
A. That the popularity of slavery would diminish with their help.
B. That slaves can do the same amount of work as free men.
C. That slaves are men.
D. That slavery is divine

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 15:50, eddie85
Read the following excerpt from string by alice childress: maydelle. oh, look at you. if you had a nice suit perhapsnone of this would have happened. joe. l. v. got a nice suit, he got maybe forty nice suits andhe live in a pretty white house with a lawn in the front of it... but he cheatswhich statement best explains how the author uses symbolism in thisexcerpt? a. joe stands for the general turmoil that followed the years after thecivil rights act of 1964, which included riots and assassinations. b. with his combination of nice clothes and immoral behavior, l. v. represents the price some african americans paid in order toescape poverty. c. by describing l v.'s clothes in the same breath as his evilbehavior, joe points out that l. v. is only good on the outside, noton the insideod. the tension between joe and l. v. culminates in a physicalaltercation that is only broken up when the women in the playintervene.
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:00, Ree0628
When greg came home for lunch, he realized that his air conditioner was broken. fragment, run on or complete sentence?
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 22:20, iliketurtures
For frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852)1) does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. 2) how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 23:00, duartealondra45
Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
3. What does Douglass state he does NOT need to prove to the audience?
A. That the popularity...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 15.07.2019 08:40