After the 1964 election, President Johnson believed that his stance on the Civil Rights Act had been a mistake. he had public support to continue his social programs. he would never be able to win political office again. the public no longer cared about Kennedy’s legacy.

What does the speaker do in the beginning of her speech that conveys she is a credible, reliable speaker

Benvolio: part, fools! put up your swords; you know not what you do. [beats down their swords.] enter tybalt. tybalt: what! art thou drawn among these heartless hinds? turn thee, benvolio, look upon thy death. benvolio: i do but keep the peace: put up thy sword, or manage it to part these men with me. tybalt: what! drawn, and talk of peace? i hate the word, as i hate hell, all montagues, and thee. have at thee, coward! [they fight.] —romeo and juliet, william shakespeare make an inference about the motivation behind each character’s actions in this earlier scene from the play. why does benvolio beat down their swords? a) he wants to be the one to fight b) he is angry that his servant is quarrelling c) he wants there to be peace why does tybalt draw his sword and fight? a) he is motivated by anger at his servants b) he is motivated by hatred of the montegues c) he is motivated by jealousy of benvolio and the awnser is not agressive. just a reminder to yall who put in the word agressive in alot of questions like mine. as the correct awnser

Based on the historical background provided, which two claims in this excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt’s "four freedoms" speech, given in 1941, can be considered inconsistent with us policy?