English
English, 28.05.2020 01:59, nila49

Conventions of English 11:Question 1
Read the following sentence, which contains grammatical errors:
There are three types of flowers in this bouquet roses daisies and
zinnias.
Which revision best corrects the sentence?
Select one:
O
There are three types of flowers in this bouquet roses, daisies, and zinnias,
O
There are three types of flowers in this bouquet roses, daisies, and zinnias
There are three types of flowers in this bouquet, roses, daisies, and zinnias.
There are three types of flowers in this bouquet; roses, daisies, and zinnias,

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 16:30, lelliott86
β€œunlike my opponent, i propose freedom from crime, freedom from poverty, and freedom from unemployment β€œ what rhetorical approach is the speaker most likely to be talking in this sentence? a. the speaker wants the audience to question the meaning of freedom and redifine it. b. the speaker wants the structure of this sentence to stand out in the listeners minds. c. the speaker wants to anticipate and address w counter-argument from his or her opponent. d. the speaker wants to transition into a topic that is largely unrelated to previous topics.
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:50, amanda1717
Grammar: sequence of verp tenses quiz active the is used for an event that has been completed before the present moment in time. simple past past perfect perfect progressive past perfect progressive
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 06:00, superstarsara5ouh83x
How does woodrow wilson make his central idea more persuasive? he argues that free trade and unrestricted commerce is the best way to ensure peace, he argues that the german people want peac and would welcome us intervention. he claims that the united states is now a major power and must restore peace, he concludes by arguing that only war can ensure others the peace and freedom that americans enjoy the answer is d. he concludes by arguing
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, natem725
Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Conventions of English 11:Question 1
Read the following sentence, which contains grammatical e...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Computers and Technology, 27.01.2021 19:30